Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
1016 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M +9247%
2.15 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-I

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
1
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
8
64
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.320 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.320 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.20 GFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
G98
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
NB9M-GS
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
12W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy