Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile vs NVIDIA H100 SXM5 64 GB

NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile vs NVIDIA H100 SXM5 64 GB

AI GPU We compared a Professional market GPU: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2200 Mobile and a GPU: 64GB VRAM H100 SXM5 64 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 700W)
NVIDIA H100 SXM5 64 GB 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 91% (1980MHz vs 1036MHz)
More VRAM (64GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1008GB/s vs 88.13GB/s)
15872 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2200 Mobile
2.122 TFLOPS
H100 SXM5 64 GB +3053%
66.91 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2017
Release Date
Mar 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla Hopper
Professional
Type
AI GPU
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

695 MHz
Base Clock
1665 MHz
1036 MHz
Boost Clock
1980 MHz
1377 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
64GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
128bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
88.13GB/s
Bandwidth
1008GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
132
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
16896
64
TMUs
528
32
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
528
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
50 MB

Theoretical Performance

33.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.52 GPixel/s
66.30 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1045 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
267.6 TFLOPS
2.122 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
66.91 TFLOPS
66.30 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
33.45 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GH100
-
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Hopper
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
4 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
80 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
814 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
700W
-
Suggested PSU
1100 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
9.0
6.4
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy