Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA GRID K520Q

NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA GRID K520Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 and 4GB VRAM GRID K520Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Boost Clock1124MHz
Lower TDP (45W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K520Q 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K620
0.863 TFLOPS
GRID K520Q +165%
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
1536
24
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
26.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GK104
GM107-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

45W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy