Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5000 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2075

NVIDIA Quadro K5000 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2075

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 and 6GB VRAM Tesla M2075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
1088 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (122W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Tesla M2075 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 +110%
2.169 TFLOPS
Tesla M2075
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
448
128
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
GF110-876-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

122W
TDP
225W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy