Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC vs AMD Radeon PRO W7900

NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC vs AMD Radeon PRO W7900

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC and 48GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
Lower TDP (122W vs 295W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7900 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2495MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 SYNC
2.169 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7900 +2727%
61.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2013
Release Date
Apr 2023
Quadro
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1855 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2495 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
96
1536
Shading Units
6144
128
TMUs
384
32
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
96
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
479.0 GPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
958.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
122.6 TFLOPS
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
61.32 TFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.916 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
Navi 31
-
GPU Variant
Navi 31
Kepler
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

122W
TDP
295W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy