Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2200M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Lower TDP (65W vs 122W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 Mac Edition +153%
2.169 TFLOPS
Quadro K2200M
0.854 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
640
128
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.67 GPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.68 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
853.8 GFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.68 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

122W
TDP
65W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy