Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (68W vs 80W)
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (1215MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
5248 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200
1.439 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 Max Q +894%
14.31 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1046 MHz
Base Clock
510 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
46
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
5888
40
TMUs
184
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.6 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
223.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.31 TFLOPS
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.31 TFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GA104
-
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²

Board Design

68W
TDP
80W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy