Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20X

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 6GB VRAM Tesla K20X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 235W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20X 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
Tesla K20X +436%
3.935 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
249.6GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
2688
32
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.99 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
164.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.935 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1312 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GK110
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Board Design

51W
TDP
235W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy