Home GPU Comparison Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU vs Intel HD Graphics 620

Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU vs Intel HD Graphics 620

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Xe Graphics 96EU and 0System Shared VRAM HD Graphics 620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 40% (1400MHz vs 1000MHz)
576 additional rendering cores
Intel HD Graphics 620 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 45W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU +459%
2.15 TFLOPS
HD Graphics 620
0.384 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Aug 2016
HD Graphics-M
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
Ring Bus

Clock Speeds

300 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1400 MHz
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
192
48
TMUs
24
24
ROPs
3
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.000 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
4.301 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
768.0 GFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
96.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Alder Lake GT1
GPU Name
Kaby Lake GT2
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.2
Architecture
Generation 9.5
Intel
Foundry
Intel
10 nm
Process Size
14 nm++
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

45W
TDP
15W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy