Home GPU Comparison Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU vs NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition

Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU vs NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Xe Graphics 96EU and 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1400MHz
720 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 45W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU +2262%
2.15 TFLOPS
GeForce 320M Mac Edition
0.091 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Apr 2010
HD Graphics-M
Generation
GeForce 300M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

300 MHz
Base Clock
-
1400 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
48
48
TMUs
16
24
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
4.301 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.20 GFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Alder Lake GT1
GPU Name
C89
-
GPU Variant
MCP89
Generation 12.2
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Intel
Foundry
-
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.486 billion
Unknown
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

45W
TDP
23W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy