Home GPU Comparison Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM

Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 340 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 99% (1550MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
H3C XG310 +297%
2.381 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 340 OEM
0.599 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2020
Release Date
May 2015
H3C Graphics
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
730 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
780 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
6
768
Shading Units
384
48
TMUs
24
24
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.72 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
599.0 GFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
37.44 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG1
GPU Name
Oland
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.1
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.95 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
50W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy