Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID M60 8Q vs AMD Radeon PRO W7900

NVIDIA GRID M60 8Q vs AMD Radeon PRO W7900

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM GRID M60 8Q and 48GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID M60 8Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 295W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7900 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 112% (2495MHz vs 1178MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID M60 8Q
4.825 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7900 +1170%
61.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Apr 2023
GRID
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

557 MHz
Base Clock
1855 MHz
1178 MHz
Boost Clock
2495 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
96
2048
Shading Units
6144
128
TMUs
384
64
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
96
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

75.39 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
479.0 GPixel/s
150.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
958.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
122.6 TFLOPS
4.825 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
61.32 TFLOPS
150.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.916 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
Navi 31
-
GPU Variant
Navi 31
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
295W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy