Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID M60 4A vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

NVIDIA GRID M60 4A vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID M60 4A and 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID M60 4A 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1178MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID M60 4A +459%
4.825 TFLOPS
Quadro K620
0.863 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Jul 2014
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

557 MHz
Base Clock
1058 MHz
1178 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
384
128
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

75.39 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
150.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.98 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
4.825 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
150.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
GM107-850-A2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
45W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
5.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy