Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K520Q vs NVIDIA Quadro P400

NVIDIA GRID K520Q vs NVIDIA Quadro P400

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID K520Q and 2GB VRAM Quadro P400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K520Q 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 32.06GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P400 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1252MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K520Q +257%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro P400
0.641 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Feb 2017
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1228 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1252 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.06GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
256
128
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.03 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.03 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.02 GFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
641.0 GFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
20.03 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GP107
-
GPU Variant
GP107-825-KA-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
30W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy