Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K520Q vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

NVIDIA GRID K520Q vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID K520Q and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K520Q 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1163MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K520Q +28%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000
1.786 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Apr 2016
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
796 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
768
128
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.22 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.82 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.786 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
55.82 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GM206
-
GPU Variant
GM206-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy