Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K520 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

NVIDIA GRID K520 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID K520 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K520 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K520 +550%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3700M
0.352 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Aug 2008
GRID
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
128
128
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.800 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
35.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
352.0 GFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM3
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy