Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K280Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K620M

NVIDIA GRID K280Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K620M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID K280Q and 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K280Q 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K280Q +165%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro K620M
0.863 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Mar 2015
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1029 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
384
128
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.992 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.98 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GM108
-
GPU Variant
N15M-Q3
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
Unknown
294 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

225W
TDP
30W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy