Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K240Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

NVIDIA GRID K240Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GRID K240Q and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K240Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1424 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (78W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K240Q +717%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3700
0.28 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Jan 2008
GRID
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
112
128
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
280.0 GFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
G92-875-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
78W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy