Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K2 vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M

NVIDIA GRID K2 vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID K2 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K2 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Lower TDP (35W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K2 +602%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro K200M
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2013
Release Date
Aug 2014
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
192
128
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GK107
GK104-895-A2
GPU Variant
N14M-Q1
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
35W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.175
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy