Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID A100A vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

NVIDIA GRID A100A vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM GRID A100A and 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID A100A 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
More VRAM (48GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 336.0GB/s)
4992 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 37% (1380MHz vs 1005MHz)
Lower TDP (80W vs 400W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID A100A +162%
13.89 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
5.299 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2020
Release Date
May 2019
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
945 MHz
1005 MHz
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
6144bit
Memory Bus
192bit
1866GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s

Render Config

108
SM Count
30
-
Compute Units
-
6912
Shading Units
1920
432
TMUs
120
192
ROPs
64
432
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
30
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB

Theoretical Performance

193.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
88.32 GPixel/s
434.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
165.6 GTexel/s
55.57 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.60 TFLOPS
13.89 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.299 TFLOPS
6.947 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
165.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
TU106
-
GPU Variant
N19E-Q1-KA-K1
Ampere
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
12 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Board Design

400W
TDP
80W
800 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
7.5
N/A
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy