Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID A100A vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

NVIDIA GRID A100A vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM GRID A100A and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID A100A 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
6880 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 400W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID A100A +23442%
13.89 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2020
Release Date
Sep 2007
GRID
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1005 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR2
6144bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1866GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

108
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
6912
Shading Units
32
432
TMUs
16
192
ROPs
8
432
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

193.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.680 GPixel/s
434.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.360 GTexel/s
55.57 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.89 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
58.88 GFLOPS
6.947 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
G84-875-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
80 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Board Design

400W
TDP
42W
800 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
1.1
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy