Home GPU Comparison Intel GMA X4500 vs Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile

Intel GMA X4500 vs Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM GMA X4500 and 0System Shared VRAM Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel GMA X4500 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 65W)
Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2200MHz
816 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GMA X4500
0.085 TFLOPS
Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile +4537%
3.942 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Dec 2023
GMA Graphics
Generation
Arc Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
FSB
Bus Interface
Ring Bus

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
300 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
80
Shading Units
896
10
TMUs
56
1
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

533.0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
5.330 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
123.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.885 TFLOPS
85.28 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.942 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Eaglelake
GPU Name
Meteor Lake GT1
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 5.0
Architecture
Xe-LPG
Intel
Foundry
Intel
65 nm
Process Size
10 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

13W
TDP
65W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

10.0
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy