NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

VS

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 's Advantages

Released 3 years and 5 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 51% (2520MHz vs 1665MHz)

More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)

15488 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages

Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1TB/s vs 1.01TB/s)

Lower TDP (75W vs 450W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce RTX 4090 +2667%

82.58 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 1650

2.984 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

GeForce RTX 4090 +916%

36549

GeForce GTX 1650

3596

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

GeForce RTX 4090 +1441%

185

GeForce GTX 1650

12

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

GeForce RTX 4090 +900%

280

GeForce GTX 1650

28

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

GeForce RTX 4090 +623%

304

GeForce GTX 1650

42

Battlefield 5 2160p

GeForce RTX 4090 +785%

186

GeForce GTX 1650

21

Battlefield 5 1440p

GeForce RTX 4090 +341%

203

GeForce GTX 1650

46

Battlefield 5 1080p

GeForce RTX 4090 +238%

213

GeForce GTX 1650

63

GTA 5 2160p

GeForce RTX 4090 +496%

167

GeForce GTX 1650

28

GTA 5 1440p

GeForce RTX 4090 +516%

185

GeForce GTX 1650

30

GTA 5 1080p

GeForce RTX 4090 +86%

186

GeForce GTX 1650

100

GeForce RTX 4090

VS

GeForce GTX 1650

Graphics Card

Sep 2022

Release Date

Apr 2019

GeForce 40

Generation

GeForce 16

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 4.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2235 MHz

Base Clock

1485 MHz

2520 MHz

Boost Clock

1665 MHz

1313 MHz

Memory Clock

2001 MHz

Memory

24GB

Memory Size

4GB

GDDR6X

Memory Type

GDDR5

384bit

Memory Bus

128bit

1.01TB/s

Bandwidth

128.1GB/s

Render Config

128

SM Count

14

-

Compute Units

-

16384

Shading Units

896

512

TMUs

56

176

ROPs

32

512

Tensor Cores

-

128

RT Cores

-

128 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

64 KB (per SM)

72 MB

L2 Cache

1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

443.5 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

53.28 GPixel/s

1290 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

93.24 GTexel/s

82.58 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

5.967 TFLOPS

82.58 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

2.984 TFLOPS

1290 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

93.24 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD102

GPU Name

TU117

AD102-300-A1

GPU Variant

TU117-300-A1

Ada Lovelace

Architecture

Turing

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

5 nm

Process Size

12 nm

76.3 billion

Transistors

4.7 billion

609 mm²

Die Size

200 mm²

Board Design

450W

TDP

75W

850 W

Suggested PSU

250 W

1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a

1x 16-pin

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 (12_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

8.9

CUDA

7.5

6.7

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB

2

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs NVIDIA RTX A6000

3

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada

4

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

5

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB

6

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs NVIDIA H100 SXM5

7

NVIDIA A10 PCIe vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

8

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs ATI Radeon HD 4700

9

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Mac Edition

10

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770