Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs AMD FirePro W600

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs AMD FirePro W600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2610MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.3GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
7936 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 285W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER +5642%
44.1 TFLOPS
FirePro W600
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2024
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 40
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2340 MHz
Base Clock
-
2610 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1313 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
672.3GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

66
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
8
8448
Shading Units
512
264
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
16
264
Tensor Cores
-
66
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
48 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

250.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
689.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
44.10 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
44.10 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
689.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD103
GPU Name
Cape Verde
AD103-275-A1
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

285W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy