Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps vs AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps vs AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1275MHz
Lower TDP (31W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.3GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps
2.285 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition +52%
3.482 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2020
Release Date
Nov 2014
GeForce MX
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1035 MHz
Base Clock
-
1275 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1362 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
174.3GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
32
896
Shading Units
2048
56
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

40.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
71.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.8 GTexel/s
4.570 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.482 TFLOPS
2.285 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.482 TFLOPS
71.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
217.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Amethyst
-
GPU Variant
Amethyst XT
Turing
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
5 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Board Design

31W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy