Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 980 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.4GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 37% (1665MHz vs 1216MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 165W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 980 +66%
4.981 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650
2.984 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 980 +20%
4330
GeForce GTX 1650
3596
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p
GeForce GTX 980 +50%
18
GeForce GTX 1650
12
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p
GeForce GTX 980 +25%
35
GeForce GTX 1650
28
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p
GeForce GTX 980 +47%
62
GeForce GTX 1650
42
GTA 5 2160p
GeForce GTX 980 +114%
60
GeForce GTX 1650
28
GTA 5 1440p
GeForce GTX 980 +106%
62
GeForce GTX 1650
30
GTA 5 1080p
GeForce GTX 980
100
GeForce GTX 1650
100
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2014
Release Date
Apr 2019
GeForce 900
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1127 MHz
Base Clock
1485 MHz
1216 MHz
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.4GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
896
128
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

77.82 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
53.28 GPixel/s
155.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.24 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.967 TFLOPS
4.981 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.984 TFLOPS
155.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
93.24 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
TU117
GM204-400-A1
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

165W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy