Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded

We compared a Mobile platform GPU: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680M and a Professional market GPU: 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 76% (1335MHz vs 758MHz)
704 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 680M
2.038 TFLOPS
RTX A500 Embedded +168%
5.468 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Mar 2022
GeForce 600M
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Mobile
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

719 MHz
Base Clock
435 MHz
758 MHz
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
1344
Shading Units
2048
112
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

21.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.72 GPixel/s
84.90 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
85.44 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.468 TFLOPS
2.038 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.468 TFLOPS
84.90 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
85.44 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GA107S
N13E-GTX-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
20W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy