Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon R7 350 640SP

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon R7 350 640SP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 350 640SP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
AMD Radeon R7 350 640SP 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
424 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 171W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
0.536 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 350 640SP +120%
1.184 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Jan 2019
GeForce 200
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s

Render Config

27
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
10
216
Shading Units
640
72
TMUs
40
28
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.80 GPixel/s
41.47 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
536.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1184 GFLOPS
67.07 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Cape Verde
G200-103-B2
GPU Variant
Cape Verde XT
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

171W
TDP
55W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy