Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and 16GB VRAM CMP 100HX 210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 56% (1785MHz vs 1147MHz)
Lower TDP (125W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (829.4GB/s vs 336.0GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
5.027 TFLOPS
CMP 100HX 210 +133%
11.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2019
Release Date
Jan 2020
GeForce 16
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
555 MHz
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
1147 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
810 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2
192bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
829.4GB/s

Render Config

22
SM Count
80
-
Compute Units
-
1408
Shading Units
5120
88
TMUs
320
48
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
96 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

85.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
146.8 GPixel/s
157.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
367.0 GTexel/s
10.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
23.49 TFLOPS
5.027 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.75 TFLOPS
157.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.873 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
GV100
TU116-300-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Board Design

125W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
7.0
6.6
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy