Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700X

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5700X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 205W)
AMD Radeon Pro W5700X 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 23% (2040MHz vs 1665MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
2.984 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W5700X +249%
10.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2019
Release Date
Dec 2019
GeForce 16
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz
Base Clock
1243 MHz
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
40
896
Shading Units
2560
56
TMUs
160
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
130.6 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
326.4 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
20.89 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.44 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
652.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Navi 10
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
7 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
10.3 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
251 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
205W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy