Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
Lower TDP (80W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
2.849 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY X +201%
8.602 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2020
Release Date
Jun 2015
GeForce 16
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
64
896
Shading Units
4096
56
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
67.20 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
268.8 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.602 TFLOPS
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.602 TFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
537.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
Fiji
TU116-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Board Design

80W
TDP
275W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy