Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs AMD Radeon Pro V5300X

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs AMD Radeon Pro V5300X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro V5300X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 32% (1590MHz vs 1201MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
AMD Radeon Pro V5300X 's Advantages
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +15%
2.849 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V5300X
2.46 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2020
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 16
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
1125 MHz
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
1201 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
16
896
Shading Units
1024
56
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.22 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.86 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.460 TFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.7 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
Baffin
TU116-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Baffin XT
Turing
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
3 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

80W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy