Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
856 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +6683%
2.849 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP
0.042 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2020
Release Date
Jun 2007
GeForce 16
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
2
896
Shading Units
40
56
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.100 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.100 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
42.00 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
RV610
TU116-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
RV610 LE AGP (215LKBALA15FG)
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Board Design

80W
TDP
20W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy