Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs ATI FirePro 2270 PCIe x1

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs ATI FirePro 2270 PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2270 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
816 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2270 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 90W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 +2867%
2.849 TFLOPS
FirePro 2270 PCIe x1
0.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2020
Release Date
Jan 2011
GeForce 16
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
1
896
Shading Units
80
56
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
96.00 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
Cedar
TU106-125-KAB-A1
GPU Variant
Cedar WS
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²

Board Design

90W
TDP
15W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy