Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 57.73GB/s)
1088 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 106W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER +634%
4.416 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
0.601 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Mar 2011
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
902 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.73GB/s

Render Config

20
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
1280
Shading Units
192
80
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.264 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.06 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
601.3 GFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
50.11 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
GF116
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
GF116-200-KA-A1
Turing
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
106W
300 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy