Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Lower TDP (49W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 40.06GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
0.803 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive +324%
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2013
Release Date
Nov 2012
GeForce 600
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
950 MHz
1252 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
40.06GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
28
384
Shading Units
1792
32
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

8.368 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
33.47 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
803.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
33.47 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK208
GPU Name
Tahiti
GK208-400-A1
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Kepler 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.02 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
87 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Board Design

49W
TDP
375W
200 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy