Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8
0.693 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY X +1141%
8.602 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2013
Release Date
Jun 2015
GeForce 600
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
64
384
Shading Units
4096
32
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

7.216 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
67.20 GPixel/s
28.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
268.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.602 TFLOPS
692.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.602 TFLOPS
28.86 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
537.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK208
GPU Name
Fiji
GK208-301-A1
GPU Variant
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
Kepler 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.02 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
87 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Board Design

25W
TDP
275W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy