Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8
0.693 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX +1722%
12.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2013
Release Date
Sep 2021
GeForce 600
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
70
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
4480
32
TMUs
280
8
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

7.216 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
28.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
692.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
28.86 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK208
GPU Name
GA100
GK208-301-A1
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
Kepler 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.02 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
87 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Board Design

25W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy