Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2 vs AMD FirePro W9000

NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2 vs AMD FirePro W9000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 210 Rev. 2 and 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 274W)
AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2032 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 210 Rev. 2
0.039 TFLOPS
FirePro W9000 +10141%
3.994 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2009
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
32
16
Shading Units
2048
8
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Tahiti
GT218-325-B1
GPU Variant
Tahiti XT GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Board Design

31W
TDP
274W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy