Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2 vs ATI FirePro V3900

NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2 vs ATI FirePro V3900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 210 Rev. 2 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 50W)
ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
464 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 210 Rev. 2
0.039 TFLOPS
FirePro V3900 +1500%
0.624 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2009
Release Date
Feb 2012
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
6
16
Shading Units
480
8
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Turks
GT218-325-B1
GPU Variant
Turks GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

31W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy