Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1224 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350 +276%
2.016 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2010
Release Date
Sep 2008
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
27
18
Compute Units
-
1440
Shading Units
216
72
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB

Theoretical Performance

22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
GT200
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
182W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy