Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W7100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition

AMD FirePro W7100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro W7100 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W7100 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
1552 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 204W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W7100 +365%
3.297 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
0.708 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Jan 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
30
28
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
240
112
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

29.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
103.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
3.297 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.297 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
206.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
GT200B
Tonga PRO GL
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
5 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
204W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy