Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4000 vs ATI Radeon X1950 PRO DUAL

AMD FirePro W4000 vs ATI Radeon X1950 PRO DUAL

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 and 512MB VRAM Radeon X1950 PRO DUAL to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 44.16GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 130W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Jan 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
690 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
44.16GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
-
48
TMUs
12
32
ROPs
12
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.900 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.900 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
RV570
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
RV570 XT (215PADAKA12FG)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.33 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
230 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
130W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1 (full) 3.0 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy