Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8700 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition

ATI FirePro V8700 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V8700 and 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8700 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (108.8GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
680 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 151W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8700 +614%
1.2 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
0.168 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2008
Release Date
Feb 2008
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
850 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
108.8GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
10
Compute Units
3
800
Shading Units
120
40
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.800 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.600 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
168.0 GFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
RV630
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Board Design

151W
TDP
45W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy