Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 X2

ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
944 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 160W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900 +97%
1.856 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 460 X2
0.942 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Mar 2011
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
7
20
Compute Units
-
1280
Shading Units
336
80
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.814 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.26 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
941.5 GFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.46 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
GF104
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
GF104-300-KB-A1
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
160W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
3x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy