Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 vs ATI FirePro V3900

ATI FirePro V7900 vs ATI FirePro V3900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
800 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900 +197%
1.856 TFLOPS
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Feb 2012
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
6
1280
Shading Units
480
80
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
Turks
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
Turks GL
TeraScale 3
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy