Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V5800 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

ATI FirePro V5800 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V5800 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V5800 's Advantages
32 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2331MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
Lower TDP (50W vs 74W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V5800
1.104 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6400 +224%
3.58 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Jan 2022
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2331 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2331 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
10
Compute Units
12
800
Shading Units
768
40
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
12
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

11.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
74.59 GPixel/s
27.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
111.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.161 TFLOPS
1104 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.580 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
223.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Juniper
GPU Name
Navi 24
Juniper XT GL
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XL-W
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.04 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
166 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Board Design

74W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy