Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V5800 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800

ATI FirePro V5800 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800

We compared a Desktop platform GPU: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V5800 and a Professional market GPU: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V5800 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
736 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (59W vs 74W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V5800 +527%
1.104 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1800
0.176 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Mar 2009
FirePro
Generation
Quadro FX
Desktop
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
768MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
8
10
Compute Units
-
800
Shading Units
64
40
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
12
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
48 KB

Theoretical Performance

11.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
27.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1104 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
176.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Juniper
GPU Name
G94
Juniper XT GL
GPU Variant
G94 GL-U
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.04 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
166 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Board Design

74W
TDP
59W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy