Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V5800 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

ATI FirePro V5800 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V5800 and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V5800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (74W vs 150W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 's Advantages
Boost Clock2640MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (216.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1760 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V5800
1.104 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4050 +1124%
13.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2505 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2640 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
216.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
18
10
Compute Units
-
800
Shading Units
2560
40
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
120
-
RT Cores
18
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 MB

Theoretical Performance

11.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
84.48 GPixel/s
27.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
211.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
13.52 TFLOPS
1104 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.52 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
211.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Juniper
GPU Name
AD107
Juniper XT GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.04 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
166 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Board Design

74W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy