Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 280X 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
Lower TDP (250W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2 +94%
7.987 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280X
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Oct 2013
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
850 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
3GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
64
Compute Units
32
4096
Shading Units
2048
256
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
Tahiti
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
250W
700 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy